![]() He had believed Russia’s insistence that it wasn’t planning to attack and felt cheated when war broke out. But as the fighting continued, he, and many of those who call in to his show, began to ask questions: Why had President Vladimir Putin deemed it necessary to invade? Was NATO fueling the fire by sending so many weapons to Ukraine?Īgain, that anyone, anywhere, could fail to see the falsity of Putin’s claims or the injustice of Russia’s actions is so baffling as to be infuriating. Here’s another story, this time from The Washington Post:Ĭlement Manyathela, who hosts a popular and influential talk show on South Africa’s Radio 702, remembers the outrage he felt when Russian troops first surged into Ukraine. If this seems frustrating or even enraging after everything Russia has done in Ukraine, hang in there. Many of those “neutral” nations have since provided crucial economic or diplomatic support for Russia. Another 47 countries abstained or missed the vote, including India and China. North Korea was one of only four countries that backed Russia and rejected the measure. But the West never won over as much of the world as it initially seemed. First, in The New York Times:Īfter Russia invaded Ukraine, the West formed what looked like an overwhelming global coalition: 141 countries supported a United Nations measure demanding that Russia unconditionally withdraw. By contrast, Russia seemed isolated. Here are a pair of stories that appeared this week. Peace is something active, something that must be sought and must be protected-even when the price seems very dear. ![]() We follow Ukraine day by day, and we do everything we can to support the Ukrainian cause, because we believe now as we did 20 years ago, when this site was founded in the run-up to another invasion, that peace is not a state of idleness, or something achieved through ignoring wrongdoing. We’re against the the destruction and disruption that every such invasion brings, and how any war brings the possibility of even greater war. We’re against the displacement and trauma. Instead, I’ll say that Daily Kos holds to the same position it had at its founding: We are against illegal, unprovoked invasions. How these Corbynites, Greenwaldians, and Hershists manage to convince themselves that the cause of justice lies with a brutal autocratic dictatorship destroying whole cities, creating torture chambers, and kidnapping children by the thousands to support a racist, homophobic, neo-fascist agenda is something I do not want to understand. There’s also a thankfully small proportion of those once on the left who somehow believe that, having once been fooled over the idea of the Soviet Union as a worker’s paradise, they are now contractually obligated to support Russia in all its actions. ![]() So does the idea that this coverage regularly celebrates Ukrainian victories on the battlefield. There’s a good portion of the populace that seems to correlate progressive with pacifist, and who assume that anti-war means being pro-surrender. ![]() government as well as NATO allies to send additional support to Ukraine, may strike some as puzzling. The fact that Daily Kos has featured consistent coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine since before the Russian tanks actually rolled in a year ago, and that this coverage often includes encouraging the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |